Admonition Of Fictitious Authority

The growing body of AI misuse case law has been added to by the Idaho Supreme Court

Petitioner Verlanic is advised that in accordance with ldaho Appellate Rule 11.2, he is responsible for the validity and accuracy of all legal citations in documents submitted to the Court. Petitioner Verlanic cited “Ybarra v. Nevada Workers’ Compensation Board 129 ldaho 740 1997,’ “ln Re: Marriage of Hall 134 ldaho 789 2000,” and “Brown v ldaho Transportation Department 140 ldaho 629 2005′, in his Petition for writ of Mandamus. These cases do not appear to exist. Citing nonexistent case law in documents submitted to this Court or any other court can result in sanctions.

The order is styled as an Admonition of Fictitious Authority. (Mike Frisch)