Driving Offenses Draw Sanction

An attorney who was convicted of three alcohol-related driving offenses has been suspended for one year retroactive to the date of his interim suspension by the Kansas Supreme Court.

Based on Rundus’ admissions and the record that supports those admissions, we adopt the findings of fact in the amended summary submission agreement. These findings of facts provide clear and convincing evidence that support the conclusions of law set out in the agreement. These findings and conclusions establish that Rundus’ conduct violated KRPC 8.4(b) and Rule 219. More specifically, the admissions establish that Rundus drove a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on three occasions and was convicted for those incidents with the third offense resulting in a felony conviction. These crimes adversely reflect on his fitness as a lawyer. KRPC 8.4(b). Rundus also admits that he failed to notify the Disciplinary Administrator’s office within 14 days after he was charged with and convicted of each of the DUI offenses.

He has fully served that time but nonetheless must establish present fitness at a reinstatement hearing

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent Laine C. Rundus’ license to practice law in Kansas is suspended for one year; the period of suspension will be retroactive, beginning on April 3, 2024. Supreme Court Rule 225(a)(3) (2024 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 278). Respondent must undergo a reinstatement hearing under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 232(e) prior to his reinstatement to the practice of law.

At the reinstatement hearing, the respondent must establish:

• He has received adequate treatment for depression;

• He has been released from criminal probation;

• He has contacted and worked with the Kansas Lawyers Assistance Program and is following any recommendations made by that program; and

• The factors in Rule 232(e)(4) weigh in favor of reinstatement.

(Mike Frisch)