Skip to content
A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

No Free Transcripts

The Ontario Law Society Appeal Division denied the request for a free transcript for appeal purposes of an attorney whose license was revoked

Ms. Stanislawski sought an order requiring that the Law Society pay for transcripts required for her appeal of the decisions of the hearing panel: (i) finding she had engaged in professional misconduct and dismissing her abuse of process motion, and (ii) revoking her licence to practise law and ordering costs against her in the amount of $125,000 payable over five years. 

In its decision, the hearing panel determined that Ms. Stanislawski had engaged in dishonest conduct. She had taken or misused about $200,000 of her former employer’s money and falsified documents to inflate her expense claims. It rejected her explanations for her actions as lacking in credibility.

Denied

Ms. Stanislawski has not met her onus: (i) to prove she has an appeal with a reasonable prospect of success; and (ii) to provide detailed proof of inability to pay.

Ontario Citizen reported on the sanction

A former Ottawa union executive has now lost her lawyer’s licence for “conduct unbecoming” after misusing funds for years — including money destined for renowned charities.

Sheila Joy Stanislawski, 66, was the longtime director of the Civic Institute of Professional Personnel (CIPP). Her career ended when she was let go after financial irregularities were discovered in 2015. The ex-union executive was also a lawyer in good standing, up until now.

Stanislawski’s licence was revoked by the Law Society of Ontario earlier this month. A disciplinary panel concluded she used the union money accounts like her own personal bank account.

The law society panel found Stanislawski knowingly took annual vacation pay to which she wasn’t entitled (amounting to around $100,000 before tax), knowingly used union money for her own purposes with at least $80,000 misused this way, received money for expenses to be paid to suppliers who weren’t actually paid, and filed false expense claims, altering documents to support the bogus claims.

(Mike Frisch)