The Hunger Game

A recent disbarment in California involves an attorney who had been convicted and defaulted on the ensuing bar charges

Respondent was convicted of violating Penal Code section 537(a)( 1) (defrauding an innkeeper by nonpayment). On September 18, 2013, Respondent entered a Whole Foods Market, began eating food from throughout various sections of the store, and walked out without paying. The manager complained that he had witnessed Respondent do the same at least on twelve occasions within recent weeks. On January 27, 2014, Respondent pled nolo contendere to a violation of Penal Code section 537(a)(1).5 On June 22, 2017, upon completion of her probation, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.4. On July 12, 2017, her petition for dismissal in this case was granted.

A default has teeth in California

Upon entry of Respondent’s default, the factual allegations set forth in Respondent’s conviction matter are deemed admitted and no further proof is required to establish the truth of such facts. (Rule 5.82.)…

Despite actual notice and opportunity, Respondent failed to participate in this disciplinary proceeding. As set forth in the Rules of Procedure of the State Bar, the court recommends disbarment.

(Mike Frisch)