Unclothed

The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission alleges that an attorney suspended for a criminal conviction violated the order by engaging in law practice

On or about January 29, 2010, Respondent was convicted of surveilling an unclothed person, a felony, in violation of MCL 750.539j(2)(a)( l ) in the Livingston Circuit Court.

As a result of the felony conviction, the Attorney Discipline Board issued a Notice of Automatic Interim Suspension involving Respondent, effective January 22, 2010.

Following the filing of a judgment of conviction action against Respondent, an Order of Suspension for one year was entered, effective September 28, 2010, in the matter of Grievance Administrator v Gienapp, Case Nos. 10-12-AI; 10-78-JC.

 The charges allege that he performed legal services while suspended.

Further

On or about July 13,2012,Respondent served a petition for reinstatement in the Supreme Court, the Attorney Discipline Board, and the Attorney Grievance Commission.

The allegations contend that he failed to disclose the instance of practice while suspended in securing reinstatement. (Mike Frisch)