A consent disbarment was imposed by 

On 24 October 2016, the North Carolina State Bar filed a formal complaint against Defendant alleging that he was convicted of contempt of court, attempted to acquire controlled substances from a client who he represented on drug-related charges, misled jail officials in an effort to gain access to an inmate, and was deceptive in response to inquiries from the State Bar, and thereby violated the Rules of Professional Conduct.· This conduct constitutes grounds for discipline under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 84-28 (b)(I) and (b)(2), in that conviction of criminal offense showing professional unfitness is grounds for imposition of professional discipline under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 84-28(b)(1), and in that Perry engaged in criminal conduct reflecting adversely on his trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, attempted to intentionally damage his client, attempted to assist a client in activity that he knew was criminal, engaged in a conflict of interest, failed to withdraw from representing a client when withdrawal was required. engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, and made false statements of fact in connection with a disciplinary matter in violation of Rule 1.7(a)(2), Rule 1.16(a), Rule 8.I(a), and Rules 8.4(a), (b), (c), & (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.