Skip to content
A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

The Kansas Supreme Court accepted the consent disbarment of an attorney facing two complaints.

 At the time the respondent surrendered his license, two complaints had been docketed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation. The complaints alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 442) (competence); 1.3 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 461) (diligence); 1.4 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 482) (communication); 1.15 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 556) (safekeeping property); 1.16 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 572) (terminating representation); and 8.4 (c) and (d) (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 672) (misconduct).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.