E-Filing Required

An Ohio attorney who is seeking to set aside default findings of misconduct has been ordered to re-file her objections in the proper form

2015-0243. Akron Bar Assn. v. Bednarksi.

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a certification of default.

Review of respondent’s amended objection filed October 5, 2015, reveals that the filing fails to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.08, which requires that all documents filed through the e-Filing portal be signed. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within seven days of the date of this entry, respondent shall file a second amended objection that is signed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.08(B).

The court’s initial order is linked here. The certificate of default and substantive allegations are linked here. (Mike Frisch)