The California Bar Journal reports:

[An attorney] was disbarred Jan. 14, 2010, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that [the attorney] failed to file an affidavit, as required by rule 9.20, that she had notified her clients, opposing counsel and other pertinent parties of her suspension. Failure to comply with the rule is grounds for disbarment.

She was placed on interim suspension in 2008 following a felony conviction for stalking. She also was publicly reproved in 1993 and suspended in 2006 for committing acts of moral turpitude by misappropriating another attorney’s identity and then using it to gain access to Claralaw.net, a private subscription service operated under the auspices of the California Public Defenders Association.

(Mike Frisch)